Wed 7 Mar 2007
About a year and a half ago I started getting all these frantic emails from my female friends urging me to read a novel called “The Time Traveler’s Wife,” by Audrey Niffenegger. If you’re a girl, you’ve probably read it, and you probably aren’t going to like what I’m going to say here in this public forum, and that is: I didn’t like this book. Also, it didn’t make me cry.
CALM DOWN. I mean, what ever happened to people being allowed to have opinions about things like books and music and movies without the threat of being yelled at or even brutally maimed?
For those of you who haven’t read this book, it’s about, well, here’s some of the synopsis from Amazon.com:
(by the way, if you have no time for synopses that involve brutally confusing melodrama, you should probably skip ahead to where I start writing again)
“Niffenegger has written a soaring love story illuminated by dozens of finely observed details and scenes, and one that skates nimbly around a huge conundrum at the heart of the book: Henry De Tamble, a rather dashing librarian at the famous Newberry Library in Chicago, finds himself unavoidably whisked around in time. He disappears from a scene in, say, 1998 to find himself suddenly, usually without his clothes, which mysteriously disappear in transit, at an entirely different place 10 years earlier-or later. During one of these migrations, he drops in on beautiful teenage Clare Abshire, an heiress in a large house on the nearby Michigan peninsula, and a lifelong passion is born. The problem is that while Henry’s age darts back and forth according to his location in time, Clare’s moves forward in the normal manner, so the pair are often out of sync.”
Sad, huh?
Not really? I TOTALLY AGREE. In a world with car bombs and starvation and racism and life-threatening illnesses and love stories that are actually sad (listen to StoryCorps on NPR, for instance, if you really want to start bawling), I don’t feel I have time for tales as weirdly contrived as this. I mean, in your typical time travel story - take “Back to the Future” - the time traveler goes back in time, their mother falls in love with them or whatever, and then they return to the present. In “The Time Traveler’s Wife,” this guy Henry is continually going back and forth between periods of just a few years and the present so not only are you royally confused, but it’s just so unbelievable. You’re supposed to sit there and be ok with the fact that this guy was just born with this ability. I think the author even informs us that, before birth, he would disappear from his mother’s womb or something. Seriously.
To counter the unbelievable nature of this terribly tragic gift, however, Niffenegger gives Henry these very human traits. Like the fact that time travel makes him feel sick. So not only is he constantly leaving the woman he loves, but every time he time travels he ends up somewhere cold and naked and nauseous, and you want to feel sorry for him, but it’s really hard, because, I mean - that time I got food poisoning? I was cold and well - not naked - but nauseous, and that was REAL. A REAL THING THAT HAPPENS TO HUMANS.
Also, the book, as you may have guessed, is ultra serious. Not one even mildly funny thing occurs in this novel. And I like humor interspersed with my grief.
So what I’m saying is that it was hard for me to find this book sad, even though I’d been promised by fanatics that I would cry the whole way through. One person told me that the reason the book was so sad was that it was a love that “truly, could never be.” I guess so but I didn’t end up feeling that bad for the characters. Call me heartless, but I’m not. I cry all the time while reading, and maybe in a later post I’ll list all the books that will really move you, with good reason.
Again, I’m only sharing my opinions this week so go ahead and read the book if you so desire. The entire rest of the world pretty much - critics included - will tell you that it’s “totally so amazing.” The only person who sided with me was our friend Kristen, who didn’t get what was so great about “The Time Traveler’s Wife,” either, thus proving her immeasurable awesomeness (Kristen, I’m really sorry to take you down with me and I hope people aren’t beating you up at work right now).
March 7th, 2007 at 1:04 pm
my roomate likes to tell me I have no soul. I think this started right around the time I picked this book up, didn’t cry and couldn’t finish it.
March 7th, 2007 at 1:05 pm
honestly, your arguments would all be valid if they held any weight whatsoever, but they are criticisms about fantasy in general and not specifically about any shortcoming of the book. this is science fiction. it requires that you use your imagination. obviously, this would make several of the scenarios exist outside of our normal world. there are many among us who enjoy harry potter, eternal sunshine, or even star trek and all of these hold true to exactly the same things that your argument riles against.
i am not one who is easily swayed by traditionally popular literature (particularly of the oprah book club ilk), but this book moved me more than any book since “a taste of blackberries” did for me back when i was 8. i fear that audiences who might truly love and enjoy this book will be turned off by your distaste for it and i think that it’s only fair that someone speak up, at least briefly, in its defense.
and screw that amazon synopsis. it has nothing to do with the text itself. it is a poor example of a text worthy of much more.
you knew how i felt about this when i wrote it. i fear nothing in my rebuttal.
ps- i am sorry you didn’t feel anything when reading it. you are missing out on a glorious experience.
March 7th, 2007 at 1:06 pm
I thought someone (who loves this book) would use this argument - that I’m complaining about a genre (science fiction) and not the book, specifically, but whatever.
And I love Harry Potter by the way. In Harry Potter, however, everything is fantasy once you get to Hogwarts while in “TTTW” (you like that? I abbreviated) it’s just one guy. It’s, like, not ENOUGH fantasy. How’s that for logical? I’m a really good critic.
March 7th, 2007 at 1:11 pm
cara, i am one of those people who loved “the time traveller’s wife”. it’s totally ok that you didn’t, but to say that you didn’t because it wasn’t realistic? nope. hahaha. wait, i just saw your above comment and i was about to mention harry potter!! i won’t now, but i stand by that argument. suspend your beliefs and enjoy the story! :)
you know what i do hate? that synopsis from amazon. that almost made me puke. i couldn’t read it. i didn’t find the book nearly as cheesy as that synopsis.
and here’s where i admit my dislike of something everyone loves. that band wilco? yeah, hate em. sorry. commence with the stone throwing.
March 7th, 2007 at 1:57 pm
I think the book sounds stupids. Oh, and I hate hippies and Asheville. How’s that for truth week??
Ok wait, I don’t hate hippies per say, I hate people who don’t bathe in the name of peace, saving the earth or whatever the hell reason they use to defend walking around smelling like Patchouli.
March 7th, 2007 at 1:58 pm
Ps- I LOVE Harry Potter. I have Book 4 to return to you guys this weekend and I would like to borrow #5!
March 7th, 2007 at 2:31 pm
I haven’t read this book and I never will because I can already tell that it sucks. also, Cara, great job on the Asheville entry. that place sucks too, and I HAVE been there. Worst place ever. It’ll be a fine day in heaven when a mudslide wipes that town off the face of the Earth.
March 7th, 2007 at 3:28 pm
I like Jeff Buckley…if there’s a blogpost this week about hating him, I’m moving to Asheville.
March 7th, 2007 at 6:41 pm
This book started a good cat-fight between you girls. MEEEOOOOW!!!
March 8th, 2007 at 10:57 am
You know what? I hate that book too! Or, not even so much that I hate it, per se, more that I just think it’s not particularly well written and full of inconsistencies. And I’m not willing to chalk that up to “science fiction”. There is some really tight sci-fi out there, and this book doesn’t measure up. The characters are irritating, totally unrealistic even disregarding the whole time-travel bit, and yes, humorless.
And as for it being a beautiful love story: go read Jane Eyre again; then we’ll talk beautiful love stories.
I just don’t see what the whole fuss is about. There are so many truly wonderful books out there; I don’t grasp why this one is garnering so much attention.
March 8th, 2007 at 11:29 am
I really like these last two posts by you, cara . set the record straight for everyone. “you ask me what you need, hate is all you need.”
March 8th, 2007 at 1:05 pm
I hate hating. It is so dumb. Hug it out bitches!!!
March 8th, 2007 at 1:07 pm
THANK YOU!!! I have no problem being outted due to my distaste for this book. It’s actually a relief to get it out in the open.
The inconsistencies with the time travel aside, I, honestly, just can’t get over people really enjoying the “love story” component of the book. I didn’t really care enough about the characters to feel any sympathy for them at all. She was kinda cold…he had a hard life and rarely showed any redeeming qualities…but they had good sex. Anh. Also, forgive me, but I found his visits to her as a child kinda creepy. There I said it.
Now let’s talk about StoryCorps because that’s something that gets me everytime.
March 8th, 2007 at 2:53 pm
claws out:
story corps and “the time traveler’s wife” are not in the same category. if we’re going to start comparing apples and oranges, i might just admit that I HATE HARRY POTTER!!!
March 8th, 2007 at 2:55 pm
I can’t help but notice the immediate increase in comment posting since you went to your new “the truth” format. I say you make this more than a one-week feature.
March 9th, 2007 at 2:43 pm
nobody hates Harry Potter - that’s just ridiculous. That’s like saying you hate Christmas